Democrats and Liberals are destroying America?

does no1 else see a conundrum with the welfare system? Democrats and liberals are destroying America. How is it that a someone can do excellent all through school then go to college, get a degree ,work very hard but struggle to support their family. But some1 else can get pregnant in 8th grade,drop out of school,never work a day in their life and our government will provide them with free cell phones,free moving,free health care,food stamps,free child care,clothing vouchers,free housing and money by taking from people who really do the right thing. Why does every1 place up with this? Whats the message this is sending…Go to school do excellent,then go to college and struggle to find a excellent paying job and while your struggling to pay bills we are going to tax you to death so we can give people who refuse to work everything they want. I can see helping some1 out who has lost their job or some1 gets a serious medical conundrum preventing them from working.But rewarding people who lay around doing nothing and letting them live of the system is ridiculous.But our government dont care even with the economy like it is and not many job opening Democrats and Liberals care more about Wall street,charitable every1 free health care,spending our money like water,bailing banks and other countries out and”Climate Change” which isn’t even a proven thing and are letting the EPA shut down jobs,take away permits and make regulations causing layoffs. Why do we place up with this? Does no1 care that our children are going to suffer greatly because of what we are letting this admin. do to this country?
i never claimed to go to college, I started working straight out of high school.I really dont see how my typing and diction has anything to do with the point. at least i can say i worked and own my own car,home and didnt rely on other people to support me or my family. YOU ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT 250 A WEEK THAT YOU GET FOR DOING NOTHING,GET A JOB!!!!!!!!!

Answer by stopbeingafool
It’s very hard to take you seriously when you use “words” like some1, every1, and no1. How sad, this would have been a excellent theme for discussion too.

Answer by towwwdothello
Oh yeah, it’s always the other guy isn’t it.

Answer by Vern86
Yes, I see a huge conundrum. Someone claiming to go to college, and doesn’t know how to make paragraphs, sentences, or spelling properly. No wonder such a person struggles.

As for welfare, you try to live on $ 250 a week, with children, and see how much of a picnic it is. Welfare is not to live comfortably, only to make it at a survival level.

Answer by MINDY
It is a small percent who game the welfare system in this country.
I would be more concerned about the billions spend on unnecessary wars.

Answer by callenqhranch
Liberals are what they are….

It is the Progressives insidious pretense to get elected as a Democrat.

It is the Progressives insidious pretense to get elected as a Republican.

Total control the ability to “RULE over America” is the plot of the Progressives in America….

Read about these snakes in the grass and make up your own mind they the Progressive Party is just another name Communism:

“The Progressive Party disappeared after the 1952 election. Only time will tell if another progressive party will be formed.” They have comeback in the rig of pretending to be either a Democrat and/or a Republican… They not the Democrats have control of the House, The Senate and the White House!

http://www.u-s-description.com/pages/h1755.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Party_%28United_States,_1912%29

Give your answer to this question below!

DATA CONVICTIONS…
By: Paul DeWitt Goree Ó2006 Las Vegas, NV

Here is an fascinating, possible fiction incident. That tests the integrity of the American government and Corporate America. Business is business, day in and day out. There exist the "Free Promote" which is global and has a major influence on the culture of the world. The Free Promote, although the majority of the total is the most exclusive. It consists of Giant industries that have merged or have affiliated their interest. Then there is the "Black Promote" the black promote represent knock offs or stolen products of the Free Promote. These items are usually much less in cost, and it to provides a financial contribution to society.

The Free Promote industries, due to their expansiveness, often are regulated by the government, at least in the United States. This protection is directly obtained from the
Fact that the Federal Government interest is in the people and not in the confidential sector of the Capitalistic world. Imagine if the contrary were right, the F.D.A. wouldn't exist and anyone could place any product on the promote, and in any case of it's effects, the consumer would be at risk. The only role the government has in the FREE MARKET, is that of assuring the protection of people, from the products and services of the Free Promote that compromise their civil rights or health in general.

Although this is the matrix of governmental roles in the promote. Sometimes this is over looked, and completely insulted, for some higher goal. For example, the people of the United States have stated through various congressional expressions and legislation of codes, that basically state, the Federal government and local government should not have a integrated interest industry, whereby the citizens may be subject to some civil violation, that results in a felony criminal conviction. For the most part, these incidences that would produce some kind of complaint in the judicial system, would be addressed in civil court. A separations of industry and state, is very necessary. It preclude special treatment, blindness to oblivious concerns, etc.

Point in case, the cell phone industry is now going through a huge fraudulent accounts period. Numerous of the new accounts opened, are opened in other persons name and social security facts. Supposedly the government does require the industry to provide some protective method to preclude this. But the fraudulent incidences continue to rise and rise. When these cases are brought to court, in all incidences, the government requires the state to obtain a warrant, before they question for telephone records of any particular case. The warrant gives the state, the right to review their phone records of the accused. All is honest, yet it has come to the attention of many, that while under a warrant for one telephone digit and it's call detail, some enforcer may have escalated their data search and obtained other correlations that were later used for the arrest and conviction of many other persons, who have not association with the original right release individual. The only relationship is that of correlated data bases, with different specs.

To make matter worst, recently it was announced to the American public, that some of these cell phone companies, simply just gave PRIVATE call records to government agents. Under normal situation, any arrest obtained from such miss use of government power, would be retrailed. Basically there is in existence many felony inmates, arrested and charged by the obtaining of illegal database information. Most of these arrest occurred between 1999 and 2005. Anyone conducting some illegal business over a telephone, may be one of these persons, voided of due process and arrested on information that was not and would not otherwise be linked or obtained by arresting agents. The charges are various in scenery and many include other charges.

For example, Mr. Doe bought a cell phone on the black promote. More than liable the phone is a fraudulent phone, but due to the cell phone carrier, this account is working fine. Possibly these service providers should be fined for their reckless use of their customers vital information. Anyway Mr. Doe is in possession of large quantities of a drug. Mr. Doe has a son, and his son has a girlfriend, who he often calls on their home phone line.

Sometimes while away from his home, Mr,Doe uses his cell phone to call his home phone. The transfer of calls continue on and on. Then one day, the person who sold Mr. Doe the phone, is arrested for fraud, in his case, he is arrested for promotion credit cards. He has a cell phone on him, during the arrest, and it is place into the evidence room. Upon reviewing the evidence of his arrest, enforcers scroll through his cell phone. Some how all of the facts in the cell phone are entered into a data base. The arrested person does not have Mr. Doe's phone in his phone, but when the records are reviewed, it is found that Mr.Doe received a call from this phone. There are other people who received phone calls from this phone also. Next, the enforcer cross database that first finding, and he also includes home phone and business phone facts.

As it turns out, Mr.Doe's son while on the home line, received a call from Mr. Doe, at the same time Mr. Doe had received a call from the arrested person. His call was documented, but not available he received a busy signal. The enforcer then chose (based on this one incident of accidental occurrence) chose to just run Mr. Does' cell phone and home line digit. And to their accepted bolt from the blue they find numerous correlations to other persons of interest to them, that have no relation to the arrested person. Nevertheless, the ID are processed, and warrants issued. But Mr. Doe's warrant was issued on the violation of the 4th amendment. First of all Mr. Doe's relationship with his cell phone carrier is a civil confidential affair. Second Mr.Doe's phone records belong only to him, and on their own did not suggest any possible association.

The issue is of fantastic concern, because it is a Bill of Right violation, by which the above example occurred. A question of interest arises, Who owns the data detail of the phone bill? We might take upon yourself that since the consumer paid for the service and security of the service, and since the consumer called the phone facts listed on the bill, or contracted usage for those facts to be called, that the detail and phone facts listed on the bill, are the property of the account holder, once the account has expired it's contract, without renewing a new contract, but keeping service to what ever phone digit given to them. But seeming that during the contractual period, the account title-holder is in actuality LEASING the service, the phone digit from the phone carrier, of which the only part of the phone that is really theirs, is the phone equipment, if it's was bought in complete.

But there exist a hidden event by which the about contract would be voided, by the carrier because a part of the phone equipment was not provided to the account holder, when they bought the phone. This part is termed SUBSIDY CODE. I call 3 manufactures during the month of June 2003, of which I had a simple question. Can I buy a cell phone from you, directly? Two of the three manufactures answered yes. They are Motorola and Nokia. At Motorola I was informed that if I wanted to buy a cell phone from them directly, I would have to indicate which carrier I intended to receive service from. At the time, Motorola offered service with T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T for the phone in question. I informed the csr employee that how could I buy the phone without pre-activating it with any carrier? I was informed that this was not possible. I then informed the csr employee that I wanted to buy the phone for a friend in Mexico and that they don't offer those carriers in Mexico. Again the csr employee suggested explanation that basically stated, the phones are manufactured by carrier bids and question for, thus to buy a phone for a gift in another country, one would buy the phone from that country. I questioned why? This is America, free business, if you don't have an exclusive contract with any carrier, then why am I the consumer being pushed into a one year or two year contract by the carrier, when all I want is a Motorola product, made by Motorola, for Motorola customers.

Next I informed the csr employee that I had heard from a third carrier about something called a SUBSIDY CODE, that turns out to be the device placed in the phone, which restricts it to a prescribed carrier before it even leaves the manufactures. After numerous attempts to get a better know of the SUBSIDY CODE, I eventually took the well stated advice of the Motorola csr and management team and called the carrier. I called Verizon and Cingular, I questioned the Verizon csr employee how could I have the subsidy code remove from my phone? I was informed that the manufacturer seats the subsidy code on the phone during the manufacturing process. I informed the representative that I was just informed otherwise. I finished my phone call with both, who claimed that they do not have access to the subsidy codes.

Well the issue with subsidy codes, is that they are not right by the manufacturer and only exist as a contractual issue by the carrier. Now upon the completion of a contract with a cell phone carrier, you would reckon the subsidy code would be provided to the account holder. It seems that not even during this event would the carrier offer the subsidy code. Why would a consumer want the subsidy code, well it is the product that locks your phone into the one or two year contract, thus preventing you the option to have a free phone, which would be avoided of the data ownership issues, and would provide you, the consumer the right to shop carriers. If you were to buy a cell phone from the manufacturers, you could receive better phone rates as this would produce the carriers to compete more effectively. You could also activate your phone in a foreign country, freely choosing the carrier you want. Perhaps you could use a carrier in Mexico (who offer a low rate) and relocate to United State, still by the same phone. Nevertheless the subsidy code restricts the FREE AMERICAN CONSUMER, choose of carriers, based on phone equipment and it also locks the consumer into a one or two contract for service.

So if I had a cell phone equipment bought directly from the manufacturer, and it was unlocked, and then I chose to activate service with any carrier, and signed a one year contract anyway (I estimate honest business practice) at this point, would I own the detail to the phone bill? It seems that this is one huge confusing mess, of which some innocent people are having their privacy invaded, just because their phone digit showed up on someone else's bill. As a cell phone title-holder, I always assumed that all the data belonged to me. I was reassured of this in 2004, when Nextel offered copyright services on their phones, providing the customer the opportunity to copyright the detail, conversations, and written properties on their phone. Some people write songs, reports, or dialogue on their phone, or review PRIVATE business issues over the phone, is that what it's for any way, communication.

It's only honest that this issue be reviewed, I have submitted similar reports to the A.C.L.U concerning the invasion of privacy that occurs when the ownership of the data detail is in dispute. Consumers have to demand their right to the subsidy code, it is part of the manufactured product, when it leaves the warehouse. Now many websites and local phone companies offer consumers UNLOCK CODES for their cell phones, which range from $ 19.99 and up. But why should the consumer have to pay for something they already paid for when they bought the phone?

Answer by surfer_grl_ca
Why? because millions of people write a cheque and pay these charges without blinking an eye.

I’d rob peeople blind if they let me too

Add your own answer in the comments!
Soldiers’ unrest spreads east, north Burkina Faso
A mutiny by soldiers that started in Burkina Faso’s capital last week has spread north and east, residents said Monday.
Read more on AP via Yahoo! News

PLEASE RATE, COMMENT, AND SUBSCRIBE! Download this and any other youtube or google video quickly and easily by the FREE player from www.realplayer.com DON’T JUST WATCH THIS, DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! Show all your friends and family and ESPECIALLY PEOPLE IN POSITIONS OF POWER! TAKE ACTION. Most Americans HAVE NO CLUE that the Federal Reserve is a PRIVATE, FOR PROFIT CORPORATION! DON’T BELIEVE ME, LOOK IT UP FOR YOURSELF AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! JFK, Ron Paul, Woodrow Wilson, Milton Friedman, Ronald Reagan, and many others have spoken against the dreadful Federal Reserve system we now have which is unnecessary because our government can print the money without paying interest to the confidential for profit Federal Reserve. While our government can print money for free, the people who own the confidential Federal Reserve have made trillions off of making the US money. They loan money to the US government at interest, when our government could print it without them for free. JFK tried to get rid of the Federal Reserve by printing United States Notes because he realized that if confidential super rich bankers own the Federal Reserve and they loan money to the government, they essentially own the government. The Federal Reserve is the MAJOR reason why this country has declined financially! The Federal Reserve can be abolished and the government can do the same thing by printing money with United States Notes instead of the Federal Reserve Notes. This will save the country trillions …